Endpoint
The second case matters after an edit. Word-level timings are positional, so correcting a line leaves them describing words that are no longer there; re-aligning re-derives every output together so they cannot disagree.
It does not charge
Your credit is bound to the song when the job is created, at your organisation’s tier — the tier is an entitlement, not a per-feature price. A transcript-only job on Lyrics Pro has already paid the price that includes alignment, so aligning it later costs nothing further. Alignment does require Lyrics Pro; a Lyrics Basic organisation receives402.
Request
No body. The job id in the path is the whole request.Responses
Alignment queued —202:
200, synchronous:
GET /jobs/{id}. No new job.complete webhook is fired for work requested this way.
Repeat calls are cheap
Re-aligning text that has already been timed would produce an identical result, so it is not done. A repeat call on unchanged text returns immediately:This endpoint draws on the submit rate limit, not the read limit, because it
performs real work. Status polling is unaffected.
Errors
A failed re-alignment never leaves you worse off: nothing is written unless the new timings are usable.
Relationship to the withdrawn POST /v1/align
The old endpoint took audio and lyrics and created a second job for a recording already in the system — a second charge for one song. It never worked and returns 410. This endpoint is its replacement, and takes a job id precisely so there is one row, one charge, and audio already in the bucket.